you're reading...
Reviews, Tech Talk

Samsung Galaxy Camera: Review

Samsung Galaxy Camera: Review

I wasn’t initially planning on writing this review, but this device has intrigued me ever since I saw its release, and when I got the chance of a 30min hands-on session with this camera/phone, I figured it’d be stupid not to share my thoughts on it with you, so here we go!

Note that this post is a bit of a hybrid of my usual full-length reviews and my First Look posts; I wasn’t able to give this camera a complete test, and I’m not able to share sample images or product images, as I didn’t have the camera for long enough to do that, but it’s more than just a First Look post as I actually got some hands-on time with it, so I can explain in greater detail how it feels when actually using one. It’s a hybrid type of post indeed. I hope that makes sense. Alright, NOW let’s begin

The Samsung Galaxy Camera is a pretty unique – and rather odd – device, as in it’s not just a smartphone with a camera, and cannot simply be called a camera phone. Instead, it is both a camera and a phone. Separately. At the same time. A camera-and-phone, if you will. Alternatively, you could call it a ‘phone camera’, in the sense that is appears to be primarily a camera, with a phone built in; but whatever you call it, you have to admit it is extremely unique. Love it or hate it, there’s nothing else quite like the Galaxy Camera – I’ve not seen anything even remotely similar. It’s so different, in fact, that when writing this introduction, I find myself unable to compare it to any similar product out there on the market, which is something I often do during this part of a review. And as I believe ‘different’ to be ‘good’ most of the time, I think that’s a very good start. Samsung has been constantly innovating over the last couple of years in various areas of information technology, so I guess this sort of revolutionary product shouldn’t be that surprising, coming from them…but I have to say I AM still pretty surprised that this device made its way into the market

Samsung Galaxy Camera - Image from samsung.com

Samsung Galaxy Camera – Image from samsung.com

If you’re thinking of that Android-based Nikon Coolpix (S800c) as a similar product, that camera didn’t even make phone calls, and was a pretty ordinary smartphone to begin with. The Galaxy Camera, on the other hand, is pretty awesome as a smartphone. It’s got a large, 4.8” Super Clear Touch LCD (1280×720), runs one of the latest Android Jelly Bean versions (4.1.2 at the moment), and is powered by a very fast 1.4Ghz quad core processor, with a gig of RAM and 8GB onboard memory (expandable via SD card). As a camera, it’s got a 1/2.3” 16MP CMOS sensor, with a very long zoom lens capable of 21x optical magnification, a pop-up flash, and all the goodies that you’d expect from an above-average point-and-shoot. And naturally (being a smartphone) it’s got GPS and WiFi built in, along with 3G, and 4G LTE, although 4G is market-dependent. Nice. And if you’re wondering, it goes for around $500+, unlocked

Sounds great so far, but how does it work in practice? How does this true hybrid of smartphone and compact camera actually perform? Is it as good as it sounds? That’s what I’m here for! Let me go through my thoughts on this product and how I felt using it

If you’re wondering why I’m discussing a smartphone on a photography blog, that is because, like I just mentioned earlier, the Galaxy Camera is not just a smartphone with a camera, but is instead a camera with an Android-based smartphone built into it…so yeah, that’s why I’m writing about it here today! I’ll naturally be looking at the device primarily as a camera, and not as a mobile phone, so don’t expect my Performance review to cover call quality and 3G speeds and such! However, I’ll try to cover the basic use of this product as a smartphone, but it’s going to be mainly focused on the photography side of things

Alright, let me look deeper into the Galaxy Camera and see what I come up with! Here we go

Samsung Galaxy Camera on Amazon


As usual, if you’re interested in buying this product, my affiliate links are always open. Buying from these links will greatly help pixelogist.me stay online, so please use ‘em if you’re buying. Thanks!

Specifications You Want To Know

Alright, this is going to be interesting. I’ve never spec’d out a mobile phone before, and my usual spec structure might not work. I can’t leave out the mobile phone specs, as the smartphone aspect of this camera is a big part of it, isn’t it? Yes it is. Let’s see…

  • Body: Compact
  • Resolution: 16 mega pixels
  • Sensor Size: 1/2.3”
  • Sensor Type: CMOS
  • Lens: Samsung 4.1-86.1mm f2.8-5.9 (23-481mm equivalent)
  • Optical Zoom: 21x
  • Image Stabilization: Optical
  • Shutter Speeds: Max 1/2000 sec, Min. 16 sec
  • ISO  Range: 100-3200
  • Video: 1080p @ 30fps (or 720 x 480 @ 120fps)
  • Video Format: MPEG4, H.264
  • Metering Modes: Average, center-weighted, spot
  • Exposure Modes: P, A, S, M, Auto, and a ton of scene modes
  • Built-in Flash: Yes, pop-up
  • Hot-shoe: No
  • Autofocus: Contrast Detect
  • AF Modes: Center, Multi-area, Touch Focus, Face Detection
  • Manual Focus: No
  • Macro: 10cm
  • Screen: Super Clear Touch LCD, Gorilla Glass 2
  • Resolution: 1280 x 720 (308 ppi)
  • Touchscreen: Yes, capacitive (obviously, it’s a smartphone!)
  • Articulation: None
  • Max Drive Speed: 3.7fps
  • File Formats: JPEG only
  • 3G Network: HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100
  • 4G Network: LTE (on the 4G model only)
  • WiFi Network: 802.11 a/b/g/n
  • Bluetooth: Yes, v4.0
  • GPS: Yes
  • OS: Android Jelly Bean (4.1.2)
  • CPU: Quad Core 1.4Ghz Cortex A9
  • RAM: 1GB
  • Built-in Storage: 8GB
  • Expandable Memory: Yes, Micro SD
  • Sensors: Accelerometer, gyroscope
  • Secondary Camera: No
  • Connections: USB 2.0, HDMI Mini, WiFI
  • Memory Card Type: Micro SD/Micro SDHC
  • Dimensions: 129 x 71 x 19mm
  • Weight: 305g

First Thoughts

Alright, the specs are out of the way – I think I did a decent job – so let’s get down to my first thoughts. Seeing this camera online for the first time, I thought it looked pretty decent. As good as a camera could look with a phone on the back. I see it in real life, and my first thoughts are…it’s BIG! It really is. Very chunky indeed. I guess I should’ve expected it – what part of 4.8” LCD screen didn’t I get, I have no idea – but I didn’t. And holding it in my hand, it didn’t look too great either. So yeah, I have a problem with its size. It’s pretty large for a camera, and it’s HUGE for a mobile phone

Apart from this, it’s quite interesting. As it’s a phone, the screen can be powered on from standby anytime, which is nice…and the camera can be turned on by pressing the On/Off button on top, like a regular camera, or by opening the Camera app on the homescreen. It turns on pretty fast, and taking a couple of quick test shots in good lighting, autofocus locked without much trouble, and reasonably fast too. Turning off the camera simply retracts the lens, leaving the screen on for your smartphone needs. And that’s basically how the device works in a nutshell. It’s really cool to have a full Android system running on your camera, not just to view the pictures, but to edit, upload, and share, directly from the camera. WiFi and 3G, remember? Very cool indeed

What else? Oh yes, the lens. It’s reasonably fast for a point-and-shoot, and its super-long zoom range is pretty awesome, if you’re into that sort of thing. Sure, I always say having a superzoom is a gimmick, as most people rarely use that much zoom, but if you want it, this camera’s got it. 21x optical zoom…23-481mm equivalent…very nice. I didn’t remember that detail when I was playing around with it, and when I started zooming in, my jaw slowly dropped as it kept going on…and on…and on. Let’s just say I’m not used to that much zoom. And if I made it sound like the zoom is really slow to extend, it’s not. It’s pretty fast. I was just surprised that it had that much reach!

As a phone, let me just say that it performs as well as a $500+ smartphone should. Running Jelly Bean, with a quad core processor and 1GB RAM, everything is buttery smooth. Therefore, operating the camera with the touchscreen was a pleasure, much like my pleasant experience with the Canon EOS M. Touch focusing is very nice, and although I generally dislike touchscreen cameras, when the screen is this responsive, it’s no big deal at all. Changing modes and settings are all done through the screen, much like when using your smartphone’s camera app, and it all works beautifully well. One complaint I have is that the Galaxy Camera lacks a secondary camera. Sure, it’s got a very good one in front, but if you’re using this as your smartphone, you’re going to want to video chat…right? I would. This isn’t an option with this device

And that’s about it for my first thoughts on the camera. It’s huge, and I really don’t like that part about it. Too big to be either a phone or a camera – yet, it’s both together. I really can’t tell if people would be into this. To be honest, I wouldn’t buy such a large device that I can’t put in my pocket. I can put my Galaxy S2 smartphone in one pocket, and my RX100 in the other, but if I’m carrying around the Galaxy Camera, I’m going to need a bag. If this is just a camera we’re talking about, that’s fine – but as a mobile phone, no one wants something this big. From what I can tell right now, this is meant to be a camera…with a mobile phone that can be used in an emergency, as a backup, if you will. Only problem is, this backup phone is probably way more powerful and awesome than your main phone, which is a shame. Ah, if they only made it smaller

That, however, is my only negative first thought. The rest is all good. The thing works beautifully as a phone, and as well as a camera. Everything is quick and responsive, and feels nice to control. If it managed to be just a bit smaller, I would’ve loved it

Controls & Handling

As you would’ve guessed, if there’s one benefit of having a large camera, it’s that it handles well, and the Galaxy Camera handles quite nicely when using it to take pictures. There’s a nice curvy little grip that makes sure it’s not going to slip out of your hand, while the (very few) buttons on top are nicely within reach of your thumb or forefinger. The typical Android buttons – Home, Settings, Back – are on the right side of the large touchscreen, which means these are reachable by your right thumb too

Build quality is nothing to write home about. It’s plastic, and while it feels fairly solid, you’re not getting any of the high-quality, premium feel you get on a pure camera that costs this much. It’s a typical Samsung build, which means that while it’s just hard plastic, it is light…and I always liked that about their smartphones

Controls, well…there are hardly any physical controls, just like a regular smartphone, except for on top. I’ll go through them anyway. On the slim top panel, you have the On/Off button and the Shutter button, with the zoom rocker around it. There’s the pop-up flash on the left end of the panel, and that’s it. The only other physical button on the Galaxy Camera is a Flash button on the left SIDE of the device. There are no other buttons to be found anywhere else. Clean and minimalistic, indeed…maybe too clean

Samsung Galaxy Camera Top Panel - Image from samsung.com

Samsung Galaxy Camera Top Panel – Image from samsung.com

The rest of the controls are accessed through the Camera app, which is naturally a Samsung-designed variant of the usual Android Camera app, made specifically to access the extra features that the hardware provides. I can’t go through all of these in this review, but in general, accessing any setting you want is no more than 2 or 3 taps away. No problem at all

Samsung Galaxy Camera Back Panel - Image from samsung.com

Samsung Galaxy Camera Back Panel – Image from samsung.com

I liked the fact that the Camera app includes P, A, S, M modes, which allow you to get really creative, and they work quite well. I mention that they work quite well because I didn’t expect them to, seeing as there’s no physical dial to set aperture in Aperture Priority mode, for example…but yeah, I found myself getting quite used to things even after just 10 minutes of using it

Yeah, using this camera with the Camera app and without any hardware buttons apart from zoom and shutter release is quite easy, and a pretty nice experience. Add to that the fact that this is an Android-based device, allowing you to use apps such as Instagram and many others, and you really get the feeling that this can be rather a lot of fun. High quality Instagram! Awesome, right? If only it were smaller


As a smartphone, as I already mentioned, performance is excellent. There’s just no lag or anything of the sort to speak of. It’s all buttery smooth, as they say. Whether you’re swiping through homescreens, app pages, or loading a game, it’s just really fast…and well, considering the fact that this has a superb quad core CPU, you shouldn’t be too surprised on this aspect…but it’s always nice to get what you’re paying for

As a camera, I wouldn’t expect this to be a speed demon. After all, even though this is being marketed as a good camera, it isn’t in the class of an advanced compact like the Lumix LX7 or Sony RX100. However, in general, performance was quite good

Autofocus was fairly quick, and accurate, in good lighting conditions. Slower than the RX100, sure…slower than the Fuji X10/X20, sure…but good enough for normal use. I never had too much trouble when focusing, not even in fairly dim lighting conditions, so while it’s not blazing fast, it does the job in most conditions pretty well. No complaints at all. It’s above average

Shot to shot speed was decent too. I was able focus less than 2 seconds after capturing the previous frame. I’m not the best judge of this sort of thing, so it may have been less or more; let’s just say that I didn’t feel it was laggy or anything. Again, not super quick – slower than the advance compacts I’ve teste lately – but very acceptable, and again, I’d say it’s better than average

I didn’t try burst shooting, and I don’t think I’d ever use this feature on any compact of this sort, but it ‘boasts’ a decent 3.7fps, and I guess you can’t complain about that. No idea about how good its write speeds and buffer is. But seriously, if you’re into fast shooting, this isn’t what you should be looking at, is it? Nope

As I said, the general operation of the phone is very responsive and super smooth, and as the camera is running on the phone, the basic operation of the camera obviously has the same responsiveness…and that’s excellent

Yeah, overall performance is decent as a camera, and brilliant as a smartphone. In either camera or smartphone mode, it never feels laggy, and is very responsive, and fast. Focusing and shot-to-shot speed is fine in good light, and average in lowlight, and to be honest, it’s better than I expected


21x Optical Zoom: This one is going to be a huge selling point. Most point-and-shoot buyers love zooms, and having 21x optical zoom is something unheard of on smartphones – I’ve yet to see a smartphone with optical zoom, actually – and it’s pretty rare to have this much zoom on any sort of compact. I was surprised with the reach of this lens when testing it out, and although I don’t see myself (or many people for that matter) using the longer focal lengths too much, it’s probably a nice thing to have

Fully zoomed in. Note the Flash button on the side. Image from samsung.com

Fully zoomed in. Note the Flash button on the side. Image from samsung.com

Fast Lens: Alright, this lens is fast only in the context of smartphone, but yeah…a smartphone with f2.8 on the wide-angle end is pretty nice, and makes for decent lowlight shots…and probably a bit of background blur if you work at it. It slows to f5.9 at the telephoto end, but remember that the extreme telephoto end is the equivalent of 481mm on a full-frame camera. That’s very long indeed. What this means is that this lens is reasonably fast throughout the commonly used focal lengths, closer to f2.8 than f5.9 at most focal lengths that you’d use, and really should make for some decent shots indoors in lowlight

16MP CMOS Sensor: Yeah, this should produce good image quality…at the very least, it should produce images better than your average mobile phone. The sensor size, 1/2.3”, isn’t bad too, and is larger than most (or all other) smartphones. It’s still a really small sensor, quite a bit smaller than the ones found on higher-end compacts that cost the same $500, but by smartphone standards, it’s rather good

Very Powerful Built-in Smartphone: And this is why you’re spending $500 on this camera when you could get a better pure camera for the same price. The super-powerful smartphone running Android Jelly Bean 4.1 that is capable of doing just about everything your standalone smartphone can do. This adds a lot of interesting things you can do with your camera too, such as in-camera editing, and uploading/sharing, not to mention the fact that you can download any of the host of camera apps such as Instagram available for Android

Built-in WiFi, 3G, GPS: I guess this is understood from the above point, but I thought the convenience of all this connectivity is worth a mention. The GPS is an added benefit

Yeah, that’s a pretty decent set of special features. Unique too. There are probably more that I could list but from what I can tell, these are the few that stand out the most. Pretty impressive. Moving on…

Image Quality

I took a few sample images of my own, but wasn’t able to scrutinize them as much as I would’ve liked to, so most of my impressions on image quality come from sample images I’ve seen online…and from what I see, image quality is good. Nothing spectacular, and to be honest, I was expecting a tad better than what I saw, but it’s noticeably better than what a regular smartphone can do. I guess we have the 1/2.3” CMOS, along with the lens, to thank for that

Like all smartphones, the Galaxy Camera produced very nice daylight shots, but struggled with noise and discoloration in low lighting conditions

In daylight, the colors looked fairly natural, not oversaturated or overly contrasty, and without getting too technical, I liked what I got. The automatic white balance setting struggled with the white indoor lighting that was present where I was shooting, but that was corrected with a preset, and could easily be further adjusted in Lightroom (or a built-in Android app!)

In low lighting conditions, with ISO bumped up, images quickly get dirty, showing a fair amount of noise and discoloration that is common with smartphones, and frankly, I see little difference when I compare low light images taken on the Galaxy Camera and similar images taken on any other high-end smartphone. The Galaxy S3 or the iPhone 5 will do nearly as well. The only advantage of the Galaxy Camera is that with its slightly faster lens, you might be able to keep the ISO down by around a stop. That’s about it

Sharpness, well…I wasn’t looking for tack sharp images from this sort of camera, and it’s a good thing I wasn’t…as this lens doesn’t give you the sharpest images in the world. It’s alright, but even in the center of the frame, things are rather soft. As expected

As I always say, the single biggest factor in a digital camera is its image quality, and while the Galaxy Camera does perform better than most smartphones, for what it costs, you could get a pretty high-end smartphone that will perform nearly as well, albeit without the extreme zoom, and come in a much nicer, pocketable body, or get a dedicated premium compact camera for the same price

Anyway, if you’re looking for a conclusive statement on image quality, I’m going to say it’s better than what a normal camera phone is capable of, not close to what a high-end compact like the Lumix LX7 or Sony RX100 is capable of, and in more aspects than one is similar to a regular point-and-shoot digital camera

Samsung Galaxy Camera: Sample Images

As I said in the beginning, and again in the middle, I wasn’t able to take many sample pictures, and even the few that I did take were not really suitable to post here…so apologies for that! Instead, here are a few links to some other good reviews that have some pretty good sample images taken by the Galaxy Camera. That’s the best I can do, I’m afraid – but I hope that what I’ve written here will help you in a different way, and somehow make up for the lack of the sample images that I usually include in my full reviews!

Samsung Galaxy Camera Review | TechRadar

Samsung Galaxy Camera Review – Sample Images | PhotographyBLOG

Samsung Galaxy Camera: The First Sample Images – Pocket-Lint

Samsung Galaxy Camera: What I liked/didn’t like


  • Long zoom range – 21x optical zoom
  • 1/2.3” 16MP CMOS sensor – larger-than-average sensor, and plenty of resolution
  • Reasonably fast lens
  • Excellent LCD touchscreen
  • Very comfortable camera interface, and very responsive general operation
  • Very powerful Android-based smartphone
  • Excellent connectivity – WiFi, 3G, GPS
  • It’s a fully-featured camera with a fully-featured smartphone!


  • Huge form factor – too big to carry around either as a phone or as a camera
  • Lack of physical buttons – a few more would’ve been nice
  • Image quality could’ve been better to justify buying this as a camera
  • No RAW capability – JPEG only
  • No secondary camera for video calls


Alright, I want to like this device. I really do. I mean, you have to respect Samsung for thinking this much out of the box and actually releasing a product like this. And I do, I do like it. But I can never see myself using it. From what I’ve been reading – both expert and user reviews – it seems to be getting pretty popular…and I’m happy about that…however, there are some parts of it that just hold me back

My biggest problem with it is the size. You wouldn’t realize how large it is until you see it, until you hold it. Check out camerasize.com and compare the Galaxy with the RX100. You’d sort of get the idea then. It wouldn’t fit in any sort of pocket, unless you’re talking about a really large jacket pocket or something. These days, a camera should be able to slip into your pocket, unless it’s a mirrorless or DSLR. A mobile phone has to. If it can’t do that, it’s just not going to work, and that’s why I feel Samsung missed a trick when designing it. Maybe it was just impossible to make smaller…I don’t know

In terms of image quality, it didn’t do anything spectacular either, which brings me to the question: is the camera really that much better than that of a smartphone? The simple answer to that is yes, it is. The 16MP CMOS, with the larger-than-average-smartphone sized sensor, and the good quality, fast Samsung lens, performs well, and while it’s nothing fantastic, it’s noticeably better than a regular camera phone in both daylight and low lighting conditions. While it won’t compete with advanced compact cameras (yes, ones like the LX7 and the RX100), it does compete with regular compacts like the $200 PowerShots, and like I keep saying, is better than your usual smartphone camera. In addition to the image quality, it’s also got that really long zoom lens that is found on few compact cameras; no smartphone out there has any optical zoom as far as I know. It also performs better as a camera than most smartphones: it’s faster in operation, it’s faster when focusing, it can burst-shoot better than most phones, and handles better thanks to it’s camera-like design. So yeah, if someone asks me if this device is a good camera, and better than a camera phone, I’d definitely say yes. It is

However, is it a useable smartphone? The answer to THAT question, I’m afraid, is no. Like I said earlier, the way I see it, it’s a camera, with a phone that you could use as an emergency, as a backup to your primary phone. It’s not going to be your primary phone. It’s just too big and cumbersome. The fact that this phone is so powerful is a shame, though…and a complete waste if it’s truly meant to be used as a backup phone. And even then, it’s still too big. For me, it would’ve been ideal if they removed all the fancy smartphone bits, kept the fast, responsive touchscreen, and the WiFi connectivity (and GPS) – and made it smaller. But maybe that’s just me

I’m finding it hard to conclude this review, aren’t I? In a few lines, let me say that I like where Samsung was going with this, but I didn’t like where it ended up on the first attempt, and hence I wouldn’t buy it for myself. I wouldn’t use it. Why? Because it’s a camera that performs only as well as a regular point-and-shoot (which is fine), while being much too large, and is unusable in most circumstances as a mobile phone

Samsung Galaxy Camera on Amazon

Alright, time to stop. Let me know if you have any thoughts on this unique camera-and-phone or whatever you’d like to call it. Questions, whatever, you know what to do! Please use my affiliate links if you’re buying this thing, it’ll really mean a lot…and that’s all I have for you today. Until next time

Did you know that I’m currently working on this site full-time? Please consider making a small donation if you can – thanks!

By Heshan Jayakody
All content is my own, except the images, which are from samsung.com
Enhanced by Zemanta


18 Responses to “Samsung Galaxy Camera: Review”

  1. Solid review! I always thought it looked rather dumb and gimmicky, and although you’re trying to be nice about it, I’m pretty sure that’s how you feel too! Right?

    Posted by Justin Chambers | March 16, 2013, 17:53
    • Thanks, Justin 🙂 I admit, I’m not in love with it, but like I said, I respect the innovation! Having said that…no, I would never buy this product

      Posted by pixelogist | March 16, 2013, 19:09
  2. I hate the look of this. And after reading this, I drew myself a size chart, and wow…it IS big. I thought the whole point was to have a real compact camera built into your camera, but looks like you could get a mirrorless body for smaller than this!

    Posted by Rick | March 16, 2013, 18:19
    • Haha, yeah.. it’s rather chunky. Shame, really. If it were smaller, and took better pictures – actually, even if it took the same quality of pictures, but was smaller – it would’ve been a fascinating, and very practical product

      Posted by pixelogist | March 16, 2013, 19:12
  3. I’m not a fan of this product. Yes, sure, is unique, but cmon, it’s ugly, it’s big, and like you said yourself, the image quality is nothing that makes the bulk worth it

    Posted by Phil | March 16, 2013, 18:46
    • True – I’m not sure what part of the market Samsung is going for with this product. like I said, it’s too big too be a phone, it’s too big to be a camera, yet it’s trying to be both..and somehow, even though it sounds like that’d work, it doesn’t. And even more importantly, yes…image quality is nothing impressive

      Posted by pixelogist | March 16, 2013, 19:13
  4. it’s a really interesting gadget, from a tech perspective, and kudos to sammy for that – but is it useable? from what i’m reading here, and on other reviews, i dont think so

    Posted by Wayne | March 16, 2013, 21:52
  5. Haha I think this is a bit of a joke – no offense, Samsung. Love your phones, and love some of your cameras, but this is absolutely dumb

    Posted by Nick | April 20, 2013, 08:28
  6. Nice review – I actually kinda LIKED this device! Sure, it’s big, it’s large, it’s HUGE. But it makes a bit of a statement! Hahaha. Good one, Samsung. I wish the images were a bit better, but I might actually get myself one

    Posted by STR | May 8, 2013, 15:28
    • Well, each to their own! No doubt it’s an interesting piece of gear, but I really don’t see it being too useful, I’m afraid

      Posted by pixelogist | May 8, 2013, 18:11
  7. The pictures from this camera sucks! Sorry, Samsung. Your Galaxy S3 rocked a much better camera…the S4 is probably even better. No way I’m getting this piece of junk

    Posted by Kane | May 8, 2013, 15:50
    • Ah yes, quite possibly. I haven’t used the S3/S4 so I can’t say, but the Galaxy Camera’s images are nothing special. Why add all the extra bulk, right?

      Posted by pixelogist | May 8, 2013, 18:22
  8. Haha. Nice review. But yeah, I can’t see any reason why I’d take this big thing in my pocket, when a regular phone camera, minus the protruding lens, can take equally good shots. Only reason is the optical zoom. Not worth it. Samsung seems to like it though, adding a “Zoom’ variant to the Galaxy S4! Reviewin that any time soon?! I doubt haahh

    Posted by Vicktor | June 24, 2013, 07:11
    • Probably not (regarding the S4 Zoom) haha. That’s absolutely right, the S3/S4 and other camera phones are perfectly capable of taking equally good/better shots than this one. Except for the zoom, yes

      Posted by pixelogist | June 24, 2013, 09:38


  1. Pingback: Samsung Galaxy Camera: Review | pixelogist.me | How To Choose A Camera Lens - March 16, 2013

  2. Pingback: GPS webs » CNET GPS Reviews 2013 - July 28, 2013

Share your thoughts...leave a comment!

Follow Me on Pinterest


Feeling Generous?